Internal Error

[_Gold_Fish]

Just run into this:

Code: Select all

error: COBRA INTERNAL ERROR / AssertException / ; sourceSite = C:\Program Files\
Cobra-2010-04-02\Source\Types.cobra:784 in CobraType.memberForName for object Vo
idType-sh(5385, didBindInh=false, didBindInt=false, didBindImp=false); info
  = nil; this       = VoidType-sh(5385, didBindInh=false, didBindInt=false, didB
indImp=false);     (.didBindInh and .didBindInt) = false;         .didBindInh =
false;         .didBindInt = (short-circuited);
Compilation failed - 1 error, 0 warnings
Not running due to errors above.

Does anyone know how I can fix this?

[Charles]

Not without you sharing the code that stimulated it... which I would love for you to do so I can fix this bug.

[_Gold_Fish]

Sure stuff.

I'll put the code up here as soon as I get to the computer.

[_Gold_Fish]

class Sequence
    var _start as int
    var _count as int
    cue init(startingNumber)
        base.init
        _start = startingNumber
        _count = 1
    def solve
        currentNumber = _start
        while currentNumber > 1
            if currentNumber % 2 == 0
                currentNumber /= 2
            else
                currentNumber *= 3
                currentNumber += 1
            _count += 1
    get count from var

class Program
    def main
        print Sequence(13).solve.count

There's the code.

[Charles]

Looks like this problem is already fixed. When I use the latest Cobra from subversion, I get:

gold-fish.cobra(21): error: Cannot find a definition for "count" in "Sequence(13).solve" whose type is "void".

See HowToInstallFromSource to get it. It's actually the same installation program you used for the 2010-04-02 release, but you run Subversion first to get the latest code.

I hope to cut a release soon.

[_Gold_Fish]

Ok, I'll take a look. Thanks!

[hopscc]

You can get what you want to do to work if you change this line

Code: Select all

def solve


to

Code: Select all

def solve as Sequence


and add

Code: Select all

return this


to the end of that method.

[_Gold_Fish]

Alright, thanks hopscc. That's probably better for me, as I don't have Internet access for the computer at the moment.