Forums

Destructuring-bind and/or pattern matching

General discussion about Cobra. Releases and general news will also be posted here.
Feel free to ask questions or just say "Hello".

Destructuring-bind and/or pattern matching

Postby hack.augusto » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:46 pm

I know that Cobra supports multi assignment, but are there any plans to support those other features?
hack.augusto
 
Posts: 2

Re: Destructuring-bind and/or pattern matching

Postby Charles » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:11 pm

Not in the short run. There is still some "catch up" to do wrt to Python and C# such as multi-line strings and picking up C# extension methods.

However, if you want to improve the chances that any particular features show up in Cobra, you could put out a few examples that you think are compelling and make sense with respect to the rest of the language, and the discussion could begin.
Charles
 
Posts: 2515
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Destructuring-bind and/or pattern matching

Postby hack.augusto » Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:25 pm

I asked most out of curiosity, as the Cobra language brings lots of good stuff from other language maybe you had plans for those, but here is some thought:

Thinking of Nice and Pizza languages, each have an approach to pattern matching, looks as follow:

Nice:
Code: Select all
int fib(int n) requires n >= 0 : "Fibonacci function is not defined for negative integers!";
fib(0) = 1;
fib(1) = 1;
fib(n) = fib(n-2) + fib(n-1);

Code: Select all
enum State {Idle, On, Active}

class FinitiStateMachine {
  transition( State s, String e  ){ last = "Unknown"; }
  transition( Idle,   "TurnOn"   ){ last = "TurnOn"; state = On; }
  transition( On,     "TurnOff"  ){ last = "TurnOff"; state = Idle; }
  transition( On,     "Activate" ){ last = "Activate"; state = Active; }
  transition( Active, "Walk"     ){ last = "Walk"; }
  transition( Active, "Run"      ){ last = "Run"; }
  transition( Active, "Talk"     ){ last = "Talk"; }
  transition( Active, "Stop"     ){ last = "Stop"; state = On;}
}

Pizza:
Code: Select all
static <A,B> List<C> mapPairs((A,B)->C f, List<A> xs, List<B> ys) {
  List<C> result;

  switch (Pair.Pair(xs, ys)) {
    case Pair(List.Nil, _):
    case Pair(_, List.Nil):
      result = List.Nil;
      break;
    case Pair(List.Cons(A x, List<A> xs1),
      List.Cons(B y, List<B> ys1)):
      result = List.Cons(f(x, y), mapPairs(f, xs1, ys1));
      break;
    case _: System.out.println("case 2"); break;
  }

  return result;
}

What I had in mind was a mix of nice's and pizza's approaches with some syntax sugar on top for basic data types (arrays, lists, tuples(?)), something more like Lisp's macros params or Haskell's patterns:
Code: Select all
sig MapFunction(a as int);

def map( [] ) = 0
def map( [a : rest ] as List<int>, c as MapFunction):
  return [ c(a) : map(rest, c) ]
hack.augusto
 
Posts: 2


Return to Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests