for an expression with unclosed/unbalanced parentheses. This is extremely convenient.
Cobra already has (undoc unmentioned?) support for this for array, list and dictionary literals e.g.
- Code: Select all
a = { 'a':1,
'b':2,
'c':3,
}
b = [ 1,
2,3,
4,
]
c = @[
'a',
'b','c',
'd',
]
compiles fine
Theres supporting (spaceAgnostic) coding existing for () enclosed method calls (currently not enabled).
I dont know what the issues may be with supporting implicit line continuation with arbitrary paren enclosed expressions but
it would ease code layout (avoiding a major area of pathologically long lines) and/or line continuation clutter
if at minimum the above code for method calls were enabled and the same support provided on method (and signature) definitions
allowing something like
- Code: Select all
.foo('argument Number 1',
'argument Number2',
'aregularArgument number3' )
...
def foo(arg1 as String,
arg2 as String,
arg3 as String ) is shared
print "in foo"
# do something
print 'foo done'
i.e multi lines for call args and parameter declarations.
comments?
