Ticket #95 (new enhancement)
cue compare
Reported by: | Chuck | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Cobra 0.9 |
Component: | Cobra Compiler | Version: | 0.8.0 |
Keywords: | cue | Cc: |
Description
cue compare(other) as int cue compare(other as X) as int
- Note that there is already a .compareTo method that Cobra will look for. That likely will need to be retired.
- is override or base.compare are required if the base class also provides this cue
- The normal means of invoking this is with a comparison operator.
- But still externally visible in case you need the value (-, 0, +) of the result.
- Need to consider if implementing this can serve as an implementation of cue equals when cue equals is not present.
- Some research and consideration is required about whether the argument to this method is typed or not, or if both cues could be declared/overloaded. Consider various generic and non-generic interfaces of .NET and JVM like IComparable<of T>. For example, one possible approach:
class X cue compare(other as X) as int ... # Causes the dynamic cue compare to be implemented if not already as if you specified: cue compare(other) as int if other is this, return 0 if other inherits X return .compare(other) # will invoked the statically typed overload else throw <exception>
Change History
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.